Triple

T18190367
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject MS E435515 entity
Predicate associatedCompanyClientTypes P97362 FINISHED
Object institutional clients LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: institutional clients | Statement: [MS, associatedCompanyClientTypes, institutional clients]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: associatedCompanyClientTypes
Context triple: [MS, associatedCompanyClientTypes, institutional clients]
  • A. relatedCompanyType
    Indicates the type or nature of the relationship that one company has to another company.
  • B. belongsToCompanyType
    Indicates that an entity is associated with or classified under a particular type or category of company.
  • C. underlyingCompanyCustomerType chosen
    Indicates the type or category of customer relationship that an underlying company has (e.g., retail, institutional, corporate).
  • D. hasAssociatedCompany
    Indicates that one entity is linked or connected to a company in an associated or affiliated manner.
  • E. associatedCompanyBusinessSegment
    Indicates that a company is linked to a specific business segment through its operations, products, or services.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d8b90c7ec081909b4694ccecb449c6 completed April 10, 2026, 8:47 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e4e0016ec08190ae853dbc89865a41 completed April 19, 2026, 2 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69e4331e92408190ad607ba4956a3897 completed April 19, 2026, 1:42 a.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 10:31 a.m.