Triple
T18174657
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Andean Community member states |
E435124
|
entity |
| Predicate | cooperateInField |
P98109
|
FINISHED |
| Object | customs policy |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: customs policy | Statement: [Andean Community member states, cooperateInField, customs policy]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: cooperateInField Context triple: [Andean Community member states, cooperateInField, customs policy]
-
A.
cooperateThrough
Indicates that entities work together or coordinate their actions by means of a specific intermediary, method, or channel.
-
B.
fieldOfCooperation
chosen
Indicates a cooperative relationship in which two or more entities work together within a particular domain, discipline, or area of activity.
-
C.
implementedInCooperationWith
Indicates that an action, project, or initiative was carried out jointly or collaboratively together with another party.
-
D.
cooperationAmong
Indicates a relationship in which multiple entities work together collaboratively toward shared goals or mutual benefit.
-
E.
definesCooperationWith
Indicates that one entity formally specifies or establishes the terms, scope, or nature of cooperative interaction with another entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8b90b7a188190b3fc7b8d4a6cd20a |
completed | April 10, 2026, 8:47 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e4df5900788190994525954a89fa3c |
completed | April 19, 2026, 1:57 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e4331baeb88190b21f50a98c36c78e |
completed | April 19, 2026, 1:42 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 10:30 a.m.