Triple
T18168252
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Mr. Gower |
E434950
|
entity |
| Predicate | moralThemeConnection |
P25343
|
FINISHED |
| Object | importance of compassion |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: importance of compassion | Statement: [Mr. Gower, moralThemeConnection, importance of compassion]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: moralThemeConnection Context triple: [Mr. Gower, moralThemeConnection, importance of compassion]
-
A.
moralTheme
chosen
Indicates that a work, event, or situation embodies or conveys a particular ethical lesson, value, or moral principle.
-
B.
moralAssociation
Indicates a perceived ethical or moral connection between entities, such as one influencing or reflecting the moral character, values, or judgment of the other.
-
C.
moralConcept
Indicates that one entity represents or embodies a moral or ethical concept in relation to another.
-
D.
moralImplication
Indicates that one situation, action, or state of affairs entails or suggests a particular moral judgment, obligation, or ethical consequence.
-
E.
derivesMoralityFrom
Indicates that one entity bases or grounds its moral principles, judgments, or ethical framework on another entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8b90b7a188190b3fc7b8d4a6cd20a |
completed | April 10, 2026, 8:47 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e4df52f8b08190ab2c4d76b510cd28 |
completed | April 19, 2026, 1:57 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e4331baeb88190b21f50a98c36c78e |
completed | April 19, 2026, 1:42 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 10:30 a.m.