Triple

T18165748
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Royal legal advisory offices E434888 entity
Predicate collaboratesWith P37 FINISHED
Object Judicial Council of Jordan — NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (3 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Judicial Council of Jordan | Statement: [Royal legal advisory offices, collaboratesWith, Judicial Council of Jordan]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07 
Target entity: Judicial Council of Jordan
Context triple: [Royal legal advisory offices, collaboratesWith, Judicial Council of Jordan]
  • A. Judiciary of Jordan
    The Judiciary of Jordan is the independent branch of the Jordanian state responsible for interpreting and applying the law through a system of civil, criminal, religious, and special courts.
  • B. Supreme Judicial Council of Bahrain
    The Supreme Judicial Council of Bahrain is the highest judicial authority in the country, overseeing the organization, independence, and functioning of the Bahraini court system.
  • C. Council of Ministers of Jordan
    The Council of Ministers of Jordan is the chief executive body of the country, composed of the prime minister and cabinet ministers who collectively oversee and implement national government policy.
  • D. Constitutional Court of Qatar
    The Constitutional Court of Qatar is the country's highest judicial authority responsible for interpreting the constitution and adjudicating constitutional disputes.
  • E. Supreme Judicial Council of Egypt
    The Supreme Judicial Council of Egypt is the highest administrative body overseeing the judiciary, responsible for managing judges’ affairs and safeguarding judicial independence in the country.
  • F. None of above. chosen
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NED2 Entity disambiguation (via description) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07 
Target entity: Judicial Council of Jordan
Target entity description: The Judicial Council of Jordan is the highest judicial authority in the country, responsible for overseeing the independence, administration, and appointments of judges within the Jordanian court system.
  • A. Judiciary of Jordan
    The Judiciary of Jordan is the independent branch of the Jordanian state responsible for interpreting and applying the law through a system of civil, criminal, religious, and special courts.
  • B. Supreme Judicial Council of Bahrain
    The Supreme Judicial Council of Bahrain is the highest judicial authority in the country, overseeing the organization, independence, and functioning of the Bahraini court system.
  • C. Council of Ministers of Jordan
    The Council of Ministers of Jordan is the chief executive body of the country, composed of the prime minister and cabinet ministers who collectively oversee and implement national government policy.
  • D. Constitutional Court of Qatar
    The Constitutional Court of Qatar is the country's highest judicial authority responsible for interpreting the constitution and adjudicating constitutional disputes.
  • E. Supreme Judicial Council of Egypt
    The Supreme Judicial Council of Egypt is the highest administrative body overseeing the judiciary, responsible for managing judges’ affairs and safeguarding judicial independence in the country.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (2 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d8b90b7a188190b3fc7b8d4a6cd20a completed April 10, 2026, 8:47 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e4dec71b7881908d123d0cea3adf1f completed April 19, 2026, 1:55 p.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 10:30 a.m.