Triple
T18150863
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Saint-Bruno-de-Montarville |
E434496
|
entity |
| Predicate | reconstitutedAsMunicipality |
P130645
|
FINISHED |
| Object | 2006 |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: 2006 | Statement: [Saint-Bruno-de-Montarville, reconstitutedAsMunicipality, 2006]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: reconstitutedAsMunicipality Context triple: [Saint-Bruno-de-Montarville, reconstitutedAsMunicipality, 2006]
-
A.
incorporatedAsMunicipality
Indicates that an area or settlement has been legally established and recognized as a municipality through a formal incorporation process.
-
B.
formerMunicipalityOf
Indicates that an entity was previously an independent municipality that has since been merged into or replaced by the referenced municipality.
-
C.
municipalityReform
Indicates a formal reorganization or restructuring of a municipality’s administrative boundaries, governance, or status.
-
D.
partOfMunicipalitySince
Indicates that an entity has been included within and administratively belonging to a specific municipality starting from a given point in time.
-
E.
formedMunicipalityOn
Indicates that a new municipality was officially created or established on a specific date.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8b90aac308190801e2c57d8c5bfe5 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 8:47 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e4de3812e8819097f025476d5c6a1d |
completed | April 19, 2026, 1:52 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e43317d11c81908d1dc14921566b47 |
completed | April 19, 2026, 1:42 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69e438f5ae2c8190b11dee46534fa5a9 |
completed | April 19, 2026, 2:07 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 10:29 a.m.