Triple
T18142278
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | British Army information manoeuvre framework |
E434292
|
entity |
| Predicate | includesCapabilityType |
P55904
|
FINISHED |
| Object | influence activities |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: influence activities | Statement: [British Army information manoeuvre framework, includesCapabilityType, influence activities]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: includesCapabilityType Context triple: [British Army information manoeuvre framework, includesCapabilityType, influence activities]
-
A.
hasCapType
Indicates that an entity possesses or is characterized by a specific type of cap or cap-like feature.
-
B.
isPartOfCapability
Indicates that one capability is a component or sub-function within a broader, composite capability.
-
C.
definesCapability
Indicates that one entity specifies or establishes the abilities, functions, or capacities that another entity can possess or perform.
-
D.
capabilityType
chosen
Indicates the type or category of capability that an entity possesses or is associated with.
-
E.
includesCapabilityArea
Indicates that one entity encompasses or contains a specific capability area as part of its overall scope or functionality.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8b90aac308190801e2c57d8c5bfe5 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 8:47 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e4de0c8aa88190b4ded7e6d05f6edf |
completed | April 19, 2026, 1:52 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e43317d11c81908d1dc14921566b47 |
completed | April 19, 2026, 1:42 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 10:29 a.m.