Triple
T1812344
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | My Humps |
E40357
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasParody |
P10352
|
FINISHED |
| Object | My Humps parody by Alanis Morissette |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: My Humps parody by Alanis Morissette | Statement: [My Humps, hasParody, My Humps parody by Alanis Morissette]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasParody Context triple: [My Humps, hasParody, My Humps parody by Alanis Morissette]
-
A.
parodies
chosen
Indicates that one entity imitates another in an exaggerated or humorous way, often to criticize or comment on the original.
-
B.
hasHumorType
Indicates that an entity possesses or is characterized by a particular style, category, or type of humor.
-
C.
hasPar
Indicates a relationship where one entity has another entity as its parent.
-
D.
hasMetafictionalRole
Indicates that an entity plays a role within a story that self-consciously comments on, references, or breaks the conventions of fiction itself.
-
E.
hasKaraokeVersion
Indicates that an entity has a corresponding karaoke (instrumental or sing-along) version of itself.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a88643a3388190a612f2ebe1fb29e7 |
completed | March 4, 2026, 7:21 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69ab694d75ac8190a4d61399c04b9fb9 |
completed | March 6, 2026, 11:54 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69aa61d6b8ec8190a1597b2e44ea6534 |
completed | March 6, 2026, 5:10 a.m. |
Created at: March 4, 2026, 7:32 p.m.