Triple
T18105499
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Committee of Safety (Hawaii) |
E433336
|
entity |
| Predicate | claimedJustificationAs |
P130462
|
FINISHED |
| Object | protection of lives and property of residents |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: protection of lives and property of residents | Statement: [Committee of Safety (Hawaii), claimedJustificationAs, protection of lives and property of residents]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: claimedJustificationAs Context triple: [Committee of Safety (Hawaii), claimedJustificationAs, protection of lives and property of residents]
-
A.
claimedAs
Indicates that one entity asserts ownership, authorship, responsibility, or some other form of association over another entity.
-
B.
claimedFor
Indicates that one entity has asserted ownership, responsibility, or entitlement over or on behalf of another entity.
-
C.
claimsToBe
Indicates that one entity asserts or declares itself to have a particular identity, role, or property, regardless of whether this assertion is true.
-
D.
claimedSee
Indicates that one entity asserted or reported having seen or visually perceived another entity or event.
-
E.
rejectedJustification
Indicates that a proposed justification or reason offered in a context (e.g., argument, decision, or claim) has been evaluated and not accepted as valid or sufficient.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8b90916008190a1f110bd7ced5473 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 8:47 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e4ddb9981c8190b33697fbcaa901b3 |
completed | April 19, 2026, 1:50 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e4330e1f2881908b2506d47c48736b |
completed | April 19, 2026, 1:42 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69e438f5ae2c8190b11dee46534fa5a9 |
completed | April 19, 2026, 2:07 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 10:28 a.m.