Triple

T1810023
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Agelastes E40309 entity
Predicate vernacularGrouping P32163 FINISHED
Object guineafowl LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: guineafowl | Statement: [Agelastes, vernacularGrouping, guineafowl]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: vernacularGrouping
Context triple: [Agelastes, vernacularGrouping, guineafowl]
  • A. regionalGrouping
    Indicates that entities are organized or associated together based on shared geographic or regional characteristics.
  • B. macrolanguageGrouping
    Indicates that one language is classified as part of a broader macrolanguage grouping that encompasses multiple closely related language varieties.
  • C. locale
    Indicates that one entity is the place, setting, or geographic area in which another entity exists, occurs, or is situated.
  • D. localeType
    Indicates the classification or category of a locale (such as region, city, or venue type) that characterizes the kind of place involved in the relationship.
  • E. majorLanguageGroupOf
    Indicates that one language group is the primary or dominant linguistic classification to which another language or set of languages belongs.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a88643a3388190a612f2ebe1fb29e7 completed March 4, 2026, 7:21 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69ab694d75ac8190a4d61399c04b9fb9 completed March 6, 2026, 11:54 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69aa61d6b8ec8190a1597b2e44ea6534 completed March 6, 2026, 5:10 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69ab694bf6a08190a02ce2fc979e6701 completed March 6, 2026, 11:54 p.m.
Created at: March 4, 2026, 7:32 p.m.