Triple

T18078828
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Duke of Somerset E432629 entity
Predicate linkedToIllegitimateLine P129724 FINISHED
Object Beaufort descendants of John of Gaunt LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Beaufort descendants of John of Gaunt | Statement: [Duke of Somerset, linkedToIllegitimateLine, Beaufort descendants of John of Gaunt]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: linkedToIllegitimateLine
Context triple: [Duke of Somerset, linkedToIllegitimateLine, Beaufort descendants of John of Gaunt]
  • A. associatedLine
    Indicates that one entity is linked or connected to a particular line (such as a line item, line of text, or line in a structure) with which it is contextually or functionally related.
  • B. connectedLine
    Indicates that two entities are joined by a continuous line or linear connection.
  • C. belongsToLine
    Indicates that an entity is a member or component of a particular line or linear grouping.
  • D. sharesTrunkLineWith
    Indicates that two entities are connected to or use the same primary communication or utility trunk line.
  • E. formedLine
    Indicates that an entity has arranged itself or others into a line or linear formation.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d8b9070cac81909fa9473fb1c3f1c7 completed April 10, 2026, 8:47 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e4d9f6a85481909894c39c8be98d5d completed April 19, 2026, 1:34 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69e3f90c652481908133a73106d78919 completed April 18, 2026, 9:35 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69e42d8eefa88190a700c7c1b4213e46 completed April 19, 2026, 1:19 a.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 10:27 a.m.