Triple
T18066998
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Central Croatia |
E432318
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasMajorRiver |
P165
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Dobra River |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Dobra River | Statement: [Central Croatia, hasMajorRiver, Dobra River]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Dobra River Context triple: [Central Croatia, hasMajorRiver, Dobra River]
-
A.
Dobra River
chosen
The Dobra River is a picturesque river in Croatia known for its clear waters, karst landscapes, and importance to local ecosystems and recreation.
-
B.
Mleczna River
The Mleczna River is a small river in central Poland that flows through the city of Radom and forms part of its local water system.
-
C.
Sajna River
The Sajna River is a small river in northern Poland that flows through the town of Reszel in the Warmian-Masurian region.
-
D.
Glina River
The Glina River is a significant river in central Europe that flows through Croatia and Bosnia and Herzegovina before joining the Kupa River.
-
E.
Bystra River
The Bystra River is a small watercourse in eastern Poland that flows through the spa town of Nałęczów and its surrounding countryside.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8b9070cac81909fa9473fb1c3f1c7 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 8:47 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e4cce97ce08190a2f8762ce545e091 |
completed | April 19, 2026, 12:39 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 10:26 a.m.