Triple

T18066121
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Maiduan E432296 entity
Predicate endangeredLanguageFamily P129683 FINISHED
Object true LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: true | Statement: [Maiduan, endangeredLanguageFamily, true]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: endangeredLanguageFamily
Context triple: [Maiduan, endangeredLanguageFamily, true]
  • A. endangeredLanguage
    Indicates that a language is at risk of falling out of use and potentially becoming extinct due to having too few active speakers or insufficient intergenerational transmission.
  • B. inLanguageFamily
    Indicates that two languages belong to the same linguistic family or classification.
  • C. ancientLanguageFamily
    Indicates that one language belongs to or descends from a historically ancient family of related languages.
  • D. majorLanguageFamilies
    Indicates that one entity is a primary or dominant language family to which the other entity (a language or group of languages) belongs.
  • E. influencedLanguageFamily
    Indicates that one language family has had a significant impact on the development, structure, or usage of another language family.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d8b9070cac81909fa9473fb1c3f1c7 completed April 10, 2026, 8:47 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e4cce97ce08190a2f8762ce545e091 completed April 19, 2026, 12:39 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69e3f90c652481908133a73106d78919 completed April 18, 2026, 9:35 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69e42d8eefa88190a700c7c1b4213e46 completed April 19, 2026, 1:19 a.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 10:26 a.m.