Triple

Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).

Phrase: Jansenist controversy | Statement: [Augustinus (work by Cornelius Jansen), controversy, Jansenist controversy]

Target entity: Jansenist controversy
Context triple: [Augustinus (work by Cornelius Jansen), controversy, Jansenist controversy]

• A. Jansenist–Jesuit controversy in France chosen
  The Jansenist–Jesuit controversy in France was a protracted 17th- and 18th-century religious and political struggle between rigorist Jansenist reformers and the more flexible, papally aligned Jesuits over grace, free will, and church authority.
• B. Gallican Church controversy
  The Gallican Church controversy was a late 17th-century dispute over the limits of papal authority and the autonomy of the French Catholic Church, culminating in papal condemnation of Gallican liberties.
• C. Half-Way Covenant controversy
  The Half-Way Covenant controversy was a 17th-century New England Puritan dispute over whether to allow the partial church membership of the unconverted children of visible saints, reflecting broader tensions about religious purity, community inclusion, and declining piety.
• D. Jansenism
  Jansenism was a 17th-century Catholic reform movement emphasizing original sin, human depravity, the necessity of divine grace, and a rigorist moral theology, strongly associated with French intellectual and religious circles.
• E. Chinese Rites controversy
  The Chinese Rites controversy was a major 17th–18th century dispute within the Catholic Church over whether traditional Chinese ancestral and Confucian rites could be considered compatible with Christian doctrine.
• F. None of above.
• G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.