Triple
T18051925
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | MarkupSafe |
E431942
|
entity |
| Predicate | escapeFunction |
P129635
|
FINISHED |
| Object | escape |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: escape | Statement: [MarkupSafe, escapeFunction, escape]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: escapeFunction Context triple: [MarkupSafe, escapeFunction, escape]
-
A.
defaultEscaping
Indicates that a value, expression, or output is automatically transformed (escaped) into a safe representation by default to prevent unintended interpretation or execution.
-
B.
escapeBehavior
Indicates a relationship where an entity actively attempts to avoid, flee from, or get away from another entity, situation, or constraint.
-
C.
escapesWith
Indicates that one entity flees or breaks free from a situation, place, or constraint together with another entity as a companion or accomplice.
-
D.
escapedBy
Indicates that an entity is freed or enabled to escape through the actions or intervention of another entity.
-
E.
safetyFunction
Indicates that one entity serves as a safety-related function or mechanism that protects, safeguards, or reduces risk for another entity or process.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8b906482481908183315b9ecf9994 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 8:47 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e4c0fe4f1881908fa8485cb3ccfa44 |
completed | April 19, 2026, 11:48 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e3f90c652481908133a73106d78919 |
completed | April 18, 2026, 9:35 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69e42d8eefa88190a700c7c1b4213e46 |
completed | April 19, 2026, 1:19 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 10:25 a.m.