Triple

T18050500
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject pathlib E431915 entity
Predicate hasFunctionality P182 FINISHED
Object creating directories LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: creating directories | Statement: [pathlib, hasFunctionality, creating directories]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasFunctionality
Context triple: [pathlib, hasFunctionality, creating directories]
  • A. providesFunctionalityOf
    Indicates that one entity supplies, implements, or makes available the capabilities or functions that are normally associated with another entity.
  • B. hasFunctionalTPS
    Indicates that an entity possesses a TPS (e.g., a system or component) that is currently operational and performing its intended function.
  • C. hasFeature chosen
    Indicates that an entity possesses, exhibits, or includes a particular characteristic, attribute, or component.
  • D. hasServiceFunction
    Indicates that an entity performs, provides, or is responsible for a particular service-related function or role.
  • E. hasFeatureCode
    Indicates that an entity is associated with a specific feature identifier or code that characterizes one of its properties or attributes.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d8b906482481908183315b9ecf9994 completed April 10, 2026, 8:47 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e4bff57ea08190a30a87993f7d3299 completed April 19, 2026, 11:43 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69e3f908da508190a088aa837ea5b7af completed April 18, 2026, 9:35 p.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 10:25 a.m.