Triple
T18049560
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Home Truth Song |
E431892
|
entity |
| Predicate | songwriterStyle |
P129615
|
FINISHED |
| Object | reflective songwriting |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: reflective songwriting | Statement: [Home Truth Song, songwriterStyle, reflective songwriting]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: songwriterStyle Context triple: [Home Truth Song, songwriterStyle, reflective songwriting]
-
A.
songwriterOn
Indicates that one entity serves as the songwriter or composer responsible for creating the musical content associated with another entity.
-
B.
coSongwriter
Indicates that two or more entities collaborated in writing the same song.
-
C.
writerOfMusicAndLyrics
Indicates that a person is the creator of both the musical composition and the song lyrics for a work.
-
D.
songwriterCollective
Indicates a relationship where a songwriter is a member of, or affiliated with, a collective group of songwriters.
-
E.
sampledSongwriter
Indicates that one entity has used or incorporated a portion of another entity’s songwriting or composition as a sample in a new work.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8b906482481908183315b9ecf9994 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 8:47 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e4bff4a6e08190a5ca8d191aa7f0ae |
completed | April 19, 2026, 11:43 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e3f908da508190a088aa837ea5b7af |
completed | April 18, 2026, 9:35 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69e42d8eefa88190a700c7c1b4213e46 |
completed | April 19, 2026, 1:19 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 10:25 a.m.