Triple
T18044379
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Modern portfolio theory |
E431733
|
entity |
| Predicate | influenced |
P9
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Black–Litterman model |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (3 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Black–Litterman model | Statement: [Modern portfolio theory, influenced, Black–Litterman model]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Black–Litterman model Context triple: [Modern portfolio theory, influenced, Black–Litterman model]
-
A.
Markowitz
Markowitz is a locality in what is now Poland that is historically notable as the birthplace of the classical philologist Ulrich von Wilamowitz-Moellendorff.
-
B.
Fama–French three-factor model
The Fama–French three-factor model is a widely used asset pricing framework that extends the traditional CAPM by explaining stock returns through market risk, company size, and value factors.
-
C.
modern portfolio theory
Modern portfolio theory is a foundational financial framework that explains how investors can construct diversified portfolios to maximize expected return for a given level of risk using quantitative optimization.
-
D.
Black CAPM (zero-beta CAPM)
Black CAPM (zero-beta CAPM) is an extension of the Capital Asset Pricing Model that allows for asset pricing without a risk-free asset by using a zero-beta portfolio as the benchmark for expected returns.
-
E.
Lucas asset pricing model
The Lucas asset pricing model is a foundational rational expectations framework in macro-finance that explains asset prices through representative-agent intertemporal consumption choices under uncertainty.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NED2
Entity disambiguation (via description)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Black–Litterman model Target entity description: The Black–Litterman model is an asset allocation framework that blends market equilibrium returns with investor views to produce more stable and intuitive portfolio weights than traditional mean-variance optimization.
-
A.
Markowitz
Markowitz is a locality in what is now Poland that is historically notable as the birthplace of the classical philologist Ulrich von Wilamowitz-Moellendorff.
-
B.
Fama–French three-factor model
The Fama–French three-factor model is a widely used asset pricing framework that extends the traditional CAPM by explaining stock returns through market risk, company size, and value factors.
-
C.
modern portfolio theory
Modern portfolio theory is a foundational financial framework that explains how investors can construct diversified portfolios to maximize expected return for a given level of risk using quantitative optimization.
-
D.
Black CAPM (zero-beta CAPM)
Black CAPM (zero-beta CAPM) is an extension of the Capital Asset Pricing Model that allows for asset pricing without a risk-free asset by using a zero-beta portfolio as the benchmark for expected returns.
-
E.
Lucas asset pricing model
The Lucas asset pricing model is a foundational rational expectations framework in macro-finance that explains asset prices through representative-agent intertemporal consumption choices under uncertainty.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8b906482481908183315b9ecf9994 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 8:47 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e4bff13f488190993445769551c9c2 |
completed | April 19, 2026, 11:43 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 10:25 a.m.