Triple
T18028432
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Corinth–Corcyra War |
E431322
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasParticipant |
P149
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Epidamnus |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Epidamnus | Statement: [Corinth–Corcyra War, hasParticipant, Epidamnus]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Epidamnus Context triple: [Corinth–Corcyra War, hasParticipant, Epidamnus]
-
A.
Epidamnos
chosen
Epidamnos was an ancient Greek colony on the Adriatic coast, located where the modern Albanian city of Durrës now stands.
-
B.
Sikyon
Sikyon was an ancient Greek city-state in the northern Peloponnese, known for its artistic and cultural achievements, especially in sculpture and painting.
-
C.
Troesmis
Troesmis was an ancient Roman military and urban settlement in the province of Moesia, strategically located near the Danube River in what is now Romania.
-
D.
Heraclea
Heraclea was an important ancient Greek city in southern Italy’s Lucania region, known for its strategic location and role in Magna Graecia.
-
E.
Aegium
Aegium was an important ancient Greek city in the region of Achaea, known as a political and religious center, especially during the Hellenistic period.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8b9050fb48190890155145deb0a66 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 8:47 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e4be332a7081909124abdd98430a8a |
completed | April 19, 2026, 11:36 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 10:25 a.m.