Triple
T18017034
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Southwestern Montana |
E431020
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasCity |
P316
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Butte |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Butte | Statement: [Southwestern Montana, hasCity, Butte]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Butte Context triple: [Southwestern Montana, hasCity, Butte]
-
A.
Butte
Butte is a small census-designated community in the Matanuska-Susitna Borough of Alaska, known for its rural character and proximity to Palmer and the Matanuska River.
-
B.
Butte City
Butte City is a small rural community located in Glenn County in the northern part of California.
-
C.
Butte, Montana
chosen
Butte, Montana is a historic mining city in southwestern Montana known for its rich copper-mining heritage and well-preserved Old West character.
-
D.
Missoula
Missoula is a vibrant city in western Montana known for its university, outdoor recreation, and cultural scene.
-
E.
Butte City, Idaho
Butte City, Idaho is a small rural town in eastern Idaho known for its historic ties to regional mining and agriculture.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8b904530081908bf341d842464856 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 8:47 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e4b9be5d0c819097e006f32d98753a |
completed | April 19, 2026, 11:17 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 10:24 a.m.