Triple
T18004961
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Havant (UK Parliament constituency) |
E430721
|
entity |
| Predicate | contains |
P35
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Bedhampton ward |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Bedhampton ward | Statement: [Havant (UK Parliament constituency), contains, Bedhampton ward]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Bedhampton ward Context triple: [Havant (UK Parliament constituency), contains, Bedhampton ward]
-
A.
Bedhampton
chosen
Bedhampton is a suburban area and former village in Hampshire, England, situated near Havant on the south coast.
-
B.
Walpole ward
Walpole ward is an electoral ward within the London Borough of Ealing, forming part of the Ealing Central and Acton parliamentary constituency.
-
C.
Harnham ward
Harnham ward is a local electoral division in Salisbury, Wiltshire, responsible for electing representatives to the local council.
-
D.
Newnham ward
Newnham ward is an electoral division within the city of Cambridge, England, representing the Newnham area on the local council.
-
E.
Harington ward
Harington ward is an electoral division within the Metropolitan Borough of Sefton in Merseyside, England, represented on the local council.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8b904530081908bf341d842464856 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 8:47 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e4b51ba1888190a339d726e92f376b |
completed | April 19, 2026, 10:57 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 10:23 a.m.