Triple

T18003488
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Baker Lake E430684 entity
Predicate nearbyResourceDevelopment P79682 FINISHED
Object mining projects in Kivalliq Region LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: mining projects in Kivalliq Region | Statement: [Baker Lake, nearbyResourceDevelopment, mining projects in Kivalliq Region]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: nearbyResourceDevelopment
Context triple: [Baker Lake, nearbyResourceDevelopment, mining projects in Kivalliq Region]
  • A. nearbyResourcePotential
    Indicates that a resource is likely available or exploitable in the vicinity of the referenced entity or location.
  • B. hasNearbyDevelopment chosen
    Indicates that a development or construction project exists in close physical proximity to the referenced entity.
  • C. nearbyProject
    Indicates that one entity is located close to or in the immediate vicinity of another entity or project.
  • D. nearbyEconomicActivity
    Indicates that there is economic activity occurring in close physical proximity to the referenced entity.
  • E. nearbyUse
    Indicates that one entity uses or operates another entity that is located nearby or in close physical proximity.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d8b904530081908bf341d842464856 completed April 10, 2026, 8:47 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e4b3ea60608190b977644e946407b7 completed April 19, 2026, 10:52 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69e3f90039e4819080527f860dca042e completed April 18, 2026, 9:34 p.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 10:23 a.m.