Triple

T18002428
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Lipa E430659 entity
Predicate governingBody P46 FINISHED
Object City Government of Lipa NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (3 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: City Government of Lipa | Statement: [Lipa, governingBody, City Government of Lipa]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: City Government of Lipa
Context triple: [Lipa, governingBody, City Government of Lipa]
  • A. City Government of Himamaylan
    The City Government of Himamaylan is the local administrative authority responsible for managing public services, development programs, and governance within Himamaylan City in the Philippines.
  • B. City Government of Antipolo
    The City Government of Antipolo is the local administrative authority responsible for managing public services, development programs, and governance within Antipolo City in the Philippines.
  • C. City Government of Pasig
    The City Government of Pasig is the local governing body responsible for administering public services, development programs, and regulatory functions within Pasig City in Metro Manila, Philippines.
  • D. City Government of Pasay
    The City Government of Pasay is the local administrative authority responsible for governing and providing public services in Pasay City, a highly urbanized area within Metro Manila in the Philippines.
  • E. Municipal Government of Licab
    The Municipal Government of Licab is the local administrative authority responsible for managing public services, development programs, and governance within the municipality of Licab in the Philippines.
  • F. None of above. chosen
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NED2 Entity disambiguation (via description) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: City Government of Lipa
Target entity description: The City Government of Lipa is the local administrative authority responsible for managing public services, development, and governance within Lipa City in the Philippines.
  • A. City Government of Himamaylan
    The City Government of Himamaylan is the local administrative authority responsible for managing public services, development programs, and governance within Himamaylan City in the Philippines.
  • B. City Government of Antipolo
    The City Government of Antipolo is the local administrative authority responsible for managing public services, development programs, and governance within Antipolo City in the Philippines.
  • C. City Government of Pasig
    The City Government of Pasig is the local governing body responsible for administering public services, development programs, and regulatory functions within Pasig City in Metro Manila, Philippines.
  • D. City Government of Pasay
    The City Government of Pasay is the local administrative authority responsible for governing and providing public services in Pasay City, a highly urbanized area within Metro Manila in the Philippines.
  • E. Municipal Government of Licab
    The Municipal Government of Licab is the local administrative authority responsible for managing public services, development programs, and governance within the municipality of Licab in the Philippines.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (2 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d8b904530081908bf341d842464856 completed April 10, 2026, 8:47 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e4b3e9498c8190bdfa7a53b0c0d8db completed April 19, 2026, 10:52 a.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 10:23 a.m.