Triple
T17997922
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Standards Committee |
E430549
|
entity |
| Predicate | typeOfEthics |
P130072
|
FINISHED |
| Object | parliamentary ethics |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: parliamentary ethics | Statement: [Standards Committee, typeOfEthics, parliamentary ethics]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: typeOfEthics Context triple: [Standards Committee, typeOfEthics, parliamentary ethics]
-
A.
typeOfEthicsLaw
Indicates that a given law pertains specifically to a particular category or type within the broader domain of ethics-related legislation.
-
B.
ethicalPrinciples
Indicates a relationship where certain actions, decisions, or agents are governed, guided, or constrained by specified ethical rules, norms, or moral standards.
-
C.
ethicalQuality
Indicates that an entity possesses a moral or ethical characteristic, such as goodness, virtue, or integrity, as evaluated by some ethical standard.
-
D.
positionOnEthics
Indicates a stance, viewpoint, or opinion that an entity holds regarding ethical principles, issues, or practices.
-
E.
styleComparedToEthics
Indicates how one entity’s style is evaluated or characterized in relation to ethical principles or standards.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8b90364248190a37381adea932f42 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 8:46 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e4b3e5c63c8190890436366c4a47c5 |
completed | April 19, 2026, 10:52 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e3f90039e4819080527f860dca042e |
completed | April 18, 2026, 9:34 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69e42d8d68288190a05dc5d7803cf823 |
completed | April 19, 2026, 1:19 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 10:23 a.m.