Triple
T17996155
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Italian general election, 2008 |
E430504
|
entity |
| Predicate | coalitionWinner |
P106387
|
FINISHED |
| Object | centre-right coalition |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: centre-right coalition | Statement: [Italian general election, 2008, coalitionWinner, centre-right coalition]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: coalitionWinner Context triple: [Italian general election, 2008, coalitionWinner, centre-right coalition]
-
A.
winnerCoalition
chosen
Indicates that the referenced group of entities forms a coalition that wins or successfully prevails in a given decision, contest, or game.
-
B.
dominantCoalition
Indicates that a particular group or alliance holds primary power or control over decision-making within a larger organization or system.
-
C.
headOfLosingCoalition
Indicates that the subject is the leader or primary representative of a coalition that has lost in a competitive or adversarial context.
-
D.
mainLosingCoalition
Indicates that the referenced group of actors forms the primary coalition that is losing or has lost in a given political or decision-making context.
-
E.
coalitionPotential
Indicates the potential or likelihood that two or more entities can form a cooperative alliance or coalition.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8b90364248190a37381adea932f42 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 8:46 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e4b3e4ae948190903ed255b0fe1dca |
completed | April 19, 2026, 10:52 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e3f90039e4819080527f860dca042e |
completed | April 18, 2026, 9:34 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 10:23 a.m.