Triple

T17994650
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject ACP–EU partnership E430468 entity
Predicate cooperationField P98109 FINISHED
Object development aid LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: development aid | Statement: [ACP–EU partnership, cooperationField, development aid]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: cooperationField
Context triple: [ACP–EU partnership, cooperationField, development aid]
  • A. fieldOfCooperation chosen
    Indicates a cooperative relationship in which two or more entities work together within a particular domain, discipline, or area of activity.
  • B. cooperationAmong
    Indicates a relationship in which multiple entities work together collaboratively toward shared goals or mutual benefit.
  • C. cooperationType
    Indicates the specific kind or form of cooperative relationship that exists between the related entities.
  • D. cooperationContext
    Indicates the situational or environmental conditions under which two or more entities are cooperating or collaborating.
  • E. definesCooperationWith
    Indicates that one entity formally specifies or establishes the terms, scope, or nature of cooperative interaction with another entity.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d8b90364248190a37381adea932f42 completed April 10, 2026, 8:46 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e4b3e3b060819086855bc01aceb42a completed April 19, 2026, 10:52 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69e3f90039e4819080527f860dca042e completed April 18, 2026, 9:34 p.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 10:23 a.m.