Triple
T17986364
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Duarte, California |
E430244
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasParksAndRecreationDepartment |
P12330
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Duarte Parks and Recreation Department |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (3 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Duarte Parks and Recreation Department | Statement: [Duarte, California, hasParksAndRecreationDepartment, Duarte Parks and Recreation Department]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Duarte Parks and Recreation Department Context triple: [Duarte, California, hasParksAndRecreationDepartment, Duarte Parks and Recreation Department]
-
A.
Newton Parks and Recreation Department
Newton Parks and Recreation Department is the municipal agency responsible for managing and maintaining the city of Newton, Massachusetts’s public parks, recreational facilities, and community programming.
-
B.
Griffith Parks and Recreation Department
The Griffith Parks and Recreation Department is the municipal agency responsible for managing and maintaining parks, recreational facilities, and community programs in Griffith, Indiana.
-
C.
Gardner Parks and Recreation Department
The Gardner Parks and Recreation Department is the municipal agency responsible for managing parks, recreational facilities, and community programs in Gardner, Kansas.
-
D.
Department of Parks and Recreation
The Department of Parks and Recreation is the Arlington County agency responsible for managing public parks, recreational facilities, and community programs for residents.
-
E.
Department of Parks and Recreation
The Department of Parks and Recreation is the municipal agency responsible for managing Atlanta’s public parks, recreational facilities, and community programs.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NED2
Entity disambiguation (via description)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Duarte Parks and Recreation Department Target entity description: Duarte Parks and Recreation Department is the municipal agency responsible for managing parks, recreational facilities, and community programs in the city of Duarte, California.
-
A.
Newton Parks and Recreation Department
Newton Parks and Recreation Department is the municipal agency responsible for managing and maintaining the city of Newton, Massachusetts’s public parks, recreational facilities, and community programming.
-
B.
Griffith Parks and Recreation Department
The Griffith Parks and Recreation Department is the municipal agency responsible for managing and maintaining parks, recreational facilities, and community programs in Griffith, Indiana.
-
C.
Gardner Parks and Recreation Department
The Gardner Parks and Recreation Department is the municipal agency responsible for managing parks, recreational facilities, and community programs in Gardner, Kansas.
-
D.
Department of Parks and Recreation
The Department of Parks and Recreation is the Arlington County agency responsible for managing public parks, recreational facilities, and community programs for residents.
-
E.
Department of Parks and Recreation
The Department of Parks and Recreation is the municipal agency responsible for managing Atlanta’s public parks, recreational facilities, and community programs.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8b90364248190a37381adea932f42 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 8:46 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e4b29b4e808190af06074168169035 |
completed | April 19, 2026, 10:46 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 10:23 a.m.