Triple

T17985519
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject William fitzOsbern E430220 entity
Predicate wasGranted P2246 FINISHED
Object extensive lands in England LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: extensive lands in England | Statement: [William fitzOsbern, wasGranted, extensive lands in England]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: wasGranted
Context triple: [William fitzOsbern, wasGranted, extensive lands in England]
  • A. authorityGranted
    Indicates that one entity has formally given another entity the power, rights, or permission to act or make decisions, typically within a defined scope or context.
  • B. grantedAs
    Indicates that one entity is conferred, assigned, or bestowed in a particular role, status, or capacity to another entity.
  • C. grantedWith
    Indicates that one entity is given, conferred, or endowed together with another entity as part of the same granting event or condition.
  • D. grantedBy chosen
    Indicates that a right, permission, or benefit is conferred or authorized by one entity to another.
  • E. grantedIn
    Indicates that something (such as a right, status, or permission) is formally conferred or authorized within a particular context, document, or jurisdiction.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d8b90364248190a37381adea932f42 completed April 10, 2026, 8:46 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e4b29b4e808190af06074168169035 completed April 19, 2026, 10:46 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69e3f8fa62688190a5d5c361ab896256 completed April 18, 2026, 9:34 p.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 10:23 a.m.