Triple
T1798503
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | TLS 1.0 |
E39658
|
entity |
| Predicate | securityLevelComparedTo |
P29844
|
FINISHED |
| Object | less secure than TLS 1.2 |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: less secure than TLS 1.2 | Statement: [TLS 1.0, securityLevelComparedTo, less secure than TLS 1.2]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: securityLevelComparedTo Context triple: [TLS 1.0, securityLevelComparedTo, less secure than TLS 1.2]
-
A.
protectionLevel
Indicates the degree or extent to which something is safeguarded against harm, risk, or unauthorized access.
-
B.
securityType
Indicates the classification or category of security associated with an entity, such as the type of financial instrument, protection mechanism, or access control applied.
-
C.
estimatedStrength
Indicates that a value represents an approximate or inferred level, magnitude, or intensity of something rather than a precisely measured strength.
-
D.
securityStatus
Indicates the current level or condition of protection, risk, or vulnerability associated with an entity or system.
-
E.
isStrongerProtectionThan
chosen
Indicates that one form of protection provides a higher level of security, defense, or safeguarding compared to another.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a88632aa588190ba3978fde0db5bbd |
completed | March 4, 2026, 7:21 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69ab61b6ea188190aab9fb839bf1e367 |
completed | March 6, 2026, 11:22 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69aa61d2f7a8819090301f92d3e358c7 |
completed | March 6, 2026, 5:10 a.m. |
Created at: March 4, 2026, 7:32 p.m.