Triple
T1798117
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Charmides |
E39650
|
entity |
| Predicate | conclusionStyle |
P14336
|
FINISHED |
| Object | aporetic ending |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: aporetic ending | Statement: [Charmides, conclusionStyle, aporetic ending]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: conclusionStyle Context triple: [Charmides, conclusionStyle, aporetic ending]
-
A.
endingStyle
chosen
Indicates the manner or stylistic form in which something concludes or is brought to an end.
-
B.
typicalConclusion
Indicates that one entity is the usual or expected outcome, result, or ending that follows from another entity or situation.
-
C.
concludedWith
Indicates that an event, process, or interaction ended or was finalized by a specific outcome, action, or state.
-
D.
concludedBy
Indicates that an event, process, or state is brought to an end or finalized by a specific agent or entity.
-
E.
concludes
Indicates that one entity brings something (such as an event, process, or discussion) to an end or reaches a final decision or judgment about it.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a88632aa588190ba3978fde0db5bbd |
completed | March 4, 2026, 7:21 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69ab61b6ea188190aab9fb839bf1e367 |
completed | March 6, 2026, 11:22 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69aa61d2f7a8819090301f92d3e358c7 |
completed | March 6, 2026, 5:10 a.m. |
Created at: March 4, 2026, 7:32 p.m.