Triple
T17974472
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Article 34 of the Constitution of Japan |
E449430
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasTypeOfGuarantee |
P77116
|
FINISHED |
| Object | procedural safeguard |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: procedural safeguard | Statement: [Article 34 of the Constitution of Japan, hasTypeOfGuarantee, procedural safeguard]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasTypeOfGuarantee Context triple: [Article 34 of the Constitution of Japan, hasTypeOfGuarantee, procedural safeguard]
-
A.
typeOfGuarantees
chosen
Indicates the specific kind or category of guarantees that one entity provides, holds, or is associated with in relation to another.
-
B.
guaranteeStatus
Indicates the current state or condition of a guarantee associated with an entity or agreement.
-
C.
mayGuarantee
Indicates that one entity has the potential or authority to provide a guarantee for another entity or outcome.
-
D.
seeksGuaranteesFor
Indicates that one entity actively pursues or requests assurances, protections, or commitments from another entity regarding a specific matter or outcome.
-
E.
guaranteeCoverage
Indicates that one party commits to providing financial or protective coverage for another party or specified situation.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8b9f9927c8190a006110c8b996e61 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 8:51 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e4b1fe24808190baa11739f4d1095f |
completed | April 19, 2026, 10:44 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e3f8fa62688190a5d5c361ab896256 |
completed | April 18, 2026, 9:34 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 10:22 a.m.