Triple
T17970
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Manhattan Project |
E354
|
entity |
| Predicate | ethicalDebate |
P1212
|
FINISHED |
| Object | use of atomic bombs on Japan |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: use of atomic bombs on Japan | Statement: [Manhattan Project, ethicalDebate, use of atomic bombs on Japan]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: ethicalDebate Context triple: [Manhattan Project, ethicalDebate, use of atomic bombs on Japan]
-
A.
opposedBy
Indicates that one entity actively resists, disagrees with, or works against the actions, views, or position of another entity.
-
B.
ideology
Indicates the belief system or set of political, social, or philosophical principles that an entity adheres to or promotes.
-
C.
advocates
Indicates that one entity publicly supports, recommends, or argues in favor of another entity or its interests.
-
D.
advises
Indicates that one entity provides guidance, recommendations, or counsel to another entity.
-
E.
elects
Indicates that one entity selects or chooses another entity for a position, role, or office, typically through a formal voting process.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a23d7ad88c8190bffe8ab091d86642 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 12:57 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a242494a548190a5776fb6cad4d4af |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:18 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a23fedf0fc8190ad99bd1da297b14d |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:07 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69a242489dbc819092c100d3fbf130ef |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:18 a.m. |
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 1:02 a.m.