Triple

T17954557
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject ADM Jabalpur v. Shivkant Shukla decision E448911 entity
Predicate alsoKnownAs P39 FINISHED
Object Habeas Corpus case NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (3 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Habeas Corpus case | Statement: [ADM Jabalpur v. Shivkant Shukla decision, alsoKnownAs, Habeas Corpus case]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Habeas Corpus case
Context triple: [ADM Jabalpur v. Shivkant Shukla decision, alsoKnownAs, Habeas Corpus case]
  • A. Habeas Corpus
    Habeas Corpus is a 1973 stage farce by British playwright Alan Bennett that satirizes sexual liberation and middle-class morality through rapid-fire wordplay and mistaken identities.
  • B. Habeas Corpus Suspension Act 1817
    The Habeas Corpus Suspension Act 1817 was a British law that temporarily allowed the government to detain individuals without trial during a period of political unrest and radical protest.
  • C. Ex parte Milligan
    Ex parte Milligan is an 1866 U.S. Supreme Court decision that limited the use of military tribunals for civilians when civil courts are open, reinforcing constitutional protections during wartime.
  • D. Habeas Corpus Act of 1867
    The Habeas Corpus Act of 1867 was a U.S. federal law that greatly expanded federal courts’ jurisdiction to hear habeas corpus petitions, particularly from individuals held in state custody, thereby strengthening federal protection of civil liberties during Reconstruction.
  • E. Betts v. Brady
    Betts v. Brady was a 1942 U.S. Supreme Court decision that held indigent defendants in state criminal cases were not automatically entitled to court-appointed counsel, a rule later overturned by Gideon v. Wainwright.
  • F. None of above. chosen
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NED2 Entity disambiguation (via description) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Habeas Corpus case
Target entity description: The "Habeas Corpus case" refers to the 1976 Indian Supreme Court decision in ADM Jabalpur v. Shivkant Shukla, which controversially held that the right to challenge unlawful detention could be suspended during a national emergency.
  • A. Habeas Corpus
    Habeas Corpus is a 1973 stage farce by British playwright Alan Bennett that satirizes sexual liberation and middle-class morality through rapid-fire wordplay and mistaken identities.
  • B. Habeas Corpus Suspension Act 1817
    The Habeas Corpus Suspension Act 1817 was a British law that temporarily allowed the government to detain individuals without trial during a period of political unrest and radical protest.
  • C. Ex parte Milligan
    Ex parte Milligan is an 1866 U.S. Supreme Court decision that limited the use of military tribunals for civilians when civil courts are open, reinforcing constitutional protections during wartime.
  • D. Habeas Corpus Act of 1867
    The Habeas Corpus Act of 1867 was a U.S. federal law that greatly expanded federal courts’ jurisdiction to hear habeas corpus petitions, particularly from individuals held in state custody, thereby strengthening federal protection of civil liberties during Reconstruction.
  • E. Betts v. Brady
    Betts v. Brady was a 1942 U.S. Supreme Court decision that held indigent defendants in state criminal cases were not automatically entitled to court-appointed counsel, a rule later overturned by Gideon v. Wainwright.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (2 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d8b9f8cca8819099836916c56b7c95 completed April 10, 2026, 8:51 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e4afaf1ddc8190b480147ac35a4912 completed April 19, 2026, 10:34 a.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 10:21 a.m.