Triple
T17954557
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | ADM Jabalpur v. Shivkant Shukla decision |
E448911
|
entity |
| Predicate | alsoKnownAs |
P39
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Habeas Corpus case |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (3 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Habeas Corpus case | Statement: [ADM Jabalpur v. Shivkant Shukla decision, alsoKnownAs, Habeas Corpus case]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Habeas Corpus case Context triple: [ADM Jabalpur v. Shivkant Shukla decision, alsoKnownAs, Habeas Corpus case]
-
A.
Habeas Corpus
Habeas Corpus is a 1973 stage farce by British playwright Alan Bennett that satirizes sexual liberation and middle-class morality through rapid-fire wordplay and mistaken identities.
-
B.
Habeas Corpus Suspension Act 1817
The Habeas Corpus Suspension Act 1817 was a British law that temporarily allowed the government to detain individuals without trial during a period of political unrest and radical protest.
-
C.
Ex parte Milligan
Ex parte Milligan is an 1866 U.S. Supreme Court decision that limited the use of military tribunals for civilians when civil courts are open, reinforcing constitutional protections during wartime.
-
D.
Habeas Corpus Act of 1867
The Habeas Corpus Act of 1867 was a U.S. federal law that greatly expanded federal courts’ jurisdiction to hear habeas corpus petitions, particularly from individuals held in state custody, thereby strengthening federal protection of civil liberties during Reconstruction.
-
E.
Betts v. Brady
Betts v. Brady was a 1942 U.S. Supreme Court decision that held indigent defendants in state criminal cases were not automatically entitled to court-appointed counsel, a rule later overturned by Gideon v. Wainwright.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NED2
Entity disambiguation (via description)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Habeas Corpus case Target entity description: The "Habeas Corpus case" refers to the 1976 Indian Supreme Court decision in ADM Jabalpur v. Shivkant Shukla, which controversially held that the right to challenge unlawful detention could be suspended during a national emergency.
-
A.
Habeas Corpus
Habeas Corpus is a 1973 stage farce by British playwright Alan Bennett that satirizes sexual liberation and middle-class morality through rapid-fire wordplay and mistaken identities.
-
B.
Habeas Corpus Suspension Act 1817
The Habeas Corpus Suspension Act 1817 was a British law that temporarily allowed the government to detain individuals without trial during a period of political unrest and radical protest.
-
C.
Ex parte Milligan
Ex parte Milligan is an 1866 U.S. Supreme Court decision that limited the use of military tribunals for civilians when civil courts are open, reinforcing constitutional protections during wartime.
-
D.
Habeas Corpus Act of 1867
The Habeas Corpus Act of 1867 was a U.S. federal law that greatly expanded federal courts’ jurisdiction to hear habeas corpus petitions, particularly from individuals held in state custody, thereby strengthening federal protection of civil liberties during Reconstruction.
-
E.
Betts v. Brady
Betts v. Brady was a 1942 U.S. Supreme Court decision that held indigent defendants in state criminal cases were not automatically entitled to court-appointed counsel, a rule later overturned by Gideon v. Wainwright.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8b9f8cca8819099836916c56b7c95 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 8:51 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e4afaf1ddc8190b480147ac35a4912 |
completed | April 19, 2026, 10:34 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 10:21 a.m.