Triple

T179444
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Janet–Cartan theorem E3651 entity
Predicate dimensionBoundType P7032 FINISHED
Object local embedding dimension upper bound LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: local embedding dimension upper bound | Statement: [Janet–Cartan theorem, dimensionBoundType, local embedding dimension upper bound]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: dimensionBoundType
Context triple: [Janet–Cartan theorem, dimensionBoundType, local embedding dimension upper bound]
  • A. dimension
    Indicates that one entity specifies a measurable extent or size attribute (such as length, width, height, or similar quantitative property) of another entity.
  • B. hasBoundaryType
    Indicates that one entity has a boundary characterized by a specific type or classification in relation to another entity or context.
  • C. hasDimension
    Indicates that an entity possesses a specific measurable extent or size along one or more axes (e.g., length, width, height).
  • D. demarcationType
    Indicates the specific way in which a boundary or separation between entities is defined, marked, or categorized.
  • E. locatedBetween
    Indicates that one entity is positioned spatially between two other reference entities.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a25374990081909766d30c79a18e0e completed Feb. 28, 2026, 2:31 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69a25900709c8190a65e778936be5dd5 completed Feb. 28, 2026, 2:54 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69a2566b53d481909c0ed40dd3719e8c completed Feb. 28, 2026, 2:43 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69a2582b7f648190b0ef676b8bdc1c65 completed Feb. 28, 2026, 2:51 a.m.
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 2:39 a.m.