Triple
T17925309
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | King’s Plain |
E448178
|
entity |
| Predicate | refersToFeatureType |
P5048
|
FINISHED |
| Object | plateau |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: plateau | Statement: [King’s Plain, refersToFeatureType, plateau]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: refersToFeatureType Context triple: [King’s Plain, refersToFeatureType, plateau]
-
A.
includesFeatureTypes
Indicates that an entity contains or encompasses specific types of features as part of its composition or definition.
-
B.
isFeatureOf
Indicates that something functions as a characteristic, attribute, or component belonging to or describing another entity.
-
C.
appliesToFeature
Indicates that something (such as a rule, constraint, or configuration) is relevant to, or governs, a specific feature.
-
D.
featureType
chosen
Indicates the specific kind or category of feature that characterizes or distinguishes an entity.
-
E.
possibleTypeOfReferent
Indicates that something could be a potential or candidate type or category to which a given referent may belong, without asserting that it definitively is that type.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8b9f79d14819095540856928f0e25 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 8:51 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e4a54e03588190b36a9bb88e4085de |
completed | April 19, 2026, 9:50 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e3f8e713d481908b4a126258c18b63 |
completed | April 18, 2026, 9:34 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 10:20 a.m.