Triple

T179168
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Federal Reserve Note E3645 entity
Predicate notRedeemableFor P7014 FINISHED
Object gold LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: gold | Statement: [Federal Reserve Note, notRedeemableFor, gold]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: notRedeemableFor
Context triple: [Federal Reserve Note, notRedeemableFor, gold]
  • A. doesNotHave
    Indicates that one entity lacks, is missing, or is not in possession of another entity or attribute.
  • B. doesNotParticipateIn
    Indicates that an entity is explicitly not involved in, associated with, or taking part in a specified activity, event, or process.
  • C. isLegalTenderFor
    Indicates that a particular currency or form of money is officially recognized by a governing authority as valid payment for debts and financial transactions within a specified jurisdiction.
  • D. doesNotOperate
    Indicates that an entity is not functioning, active, or performing its intended operation in relation to another entity or context.
  • E. doesNot
    Indicates that a specified entity lacks, refrains from, or fails to perform a particular action or exhibit a particular property in relation to another entity or context.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a25374990081909766d30c79a18e0e completed Feb. 28, 2026, 2:31 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69a25900709c8190a65e778936be5dd5 completed Feb. 28, 2026, 2:54 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69a2566b53d481909c0ed40dd3719e8c completed Feb. 28, 2026, 2:43 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69a2582b7f648190b0ef676b8bdc1c65 completed Feb. 28, 2026, 2:51 a.m.
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 2:39 a.m.