Triple
T17909065
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Diamondhead |
E447773
|
entity |
| Predicate | canReflect |
P3935
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Energy beams |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Energy beams | Statement: [Diamondhead, canReflect, Energy beams]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: canReflect Context triple: [Diamondhead, canReflect, Energy beams]
-
A.
reflectsCapability
Indicates that one entity expresses, represents, or demonstrates the ability, capacity, or potential of another entity.
-
B.
reflects
chosen
Indicates that one entity (often a surface, medium, or representation) throws back, mirrors, or otherwise shows an image, property, or state of another entity.
-
C.
canRefer
Indicates that one entity has the ability or permission to mention, point to, or direct attention to another entity.
-
D.
reflectsPolicy
Indicates that one entity embodies, represents, or is aligned with the rules, principles, or stance defined by a particular policy.
-
E.
canRepresent
Indicates that one entity is capable of serving as a valid stand-in, proxy, or expression for another entity in a given context.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8b9f6d394819082a6d69fd1e23d2f |
completed | April 10, 2026, 8:51 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e49e9e4c9881908bfc3a83809d6b85 |
completed | April 19, 2026, 9:21 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e3d8ec2f6881909d7f54b878cbed37 |
completed | April 18, 2026, 7:18 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 10:19 a.m.