Triple
T17895559
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Wheatley Housing Act 1924 |
E447423
|
entity |
| Predicate | introducedBy |
P513
|
FINISHED |
| Object | John Wheatley |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: John Wheatley | Statement: [Wheatley Housing Act 1924, introducedBy, John Wheatley]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: John Wheatley Context triple: [Wheatley Housing Act 1924, introducedBy, John Wheatley]
-
A.
John Wheatley
chosen
John Wheatley was a Scottish Labour politician and key social reformer best known for pioneering large-scale public housing policy in the United Kingdom during the 1920s.
-
B.
John Wheatley
John Wheatley was an 18th-century Boston merchant who enslaved and later manumitted the African-born poet Phillis Wheatley.
-
C.
Edward Gillett
Edward Gillett is a notable individual distinguished enough to be specifically cited as a prominent bearer of the surname Gillett.
-
D.
Amos Hodgman
Amos Hodgman was an individual significant enough in local or regional history that Hodgeman County in Kansas was named in his honor.
-
E.
Samuel Blatchford
Samuel Blatchford was an Associate Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court in the late 19th century, known for his expertise in admiralty and patent law.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8b9f59bd48190a6fc925a855b8bac |
completed | April 10, 2026, 8:51 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e49d7eb4f48190951e26975b57873b |
completed | April 19, 2026, 9:16 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 10:19 a.m.