Triple

T17892412
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Sanjar E447354 entity
Predicate alsoKnownAs P39 FINISHED
Object Ahmad Sanjar NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Ahmad Sanjar | Statement: [Sanjar, alsoKnownAs, Ahmad Sanjar]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Ahmad Sanjar
Context triple: [Sanjar, alsoKnownAs, Ahmad Sanjar]
  • A. Sultan Ahmad Sanjar chosen
    Sultan Ahmad Sanjar was a prominent 12th-century Seljuk sultan who ruled Khorasan and later much of the Seljuk Empire, known for his military campaigns, political struggles, and eventual defeat by the Khwarazmians and Oghuz Turks.
  • B. Baha al-Dawla
    Baha al-Dawla was a prominent 10th–11th century Buyid ruler who governed parts of Iran and Iraq during the later phase of the dynasty’s power.
  • C. Shams al-Dawla
    Shams al-Dawla was a Buyid dynasty ruler who governed parts of western Iran in the late 10th and early 11th centuries.
  • D. Nur al-Din Muhammad
    Nur al-Din Muhammad was a medieval Muslim ruler from the Artuqid dynasty who governed the important Anatolian city of Diyarbakır.
  • E. Fakhr al-Dawla
    Fakhr al-Dawla was a prominent 10th-century Buyid ruler who governed parts of northern Iran and played a key role in the dynasty’s regional power struggles.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (2 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d8b9f59bd48190a6fc925a855b8bac completed April 10, 2026, 8:51 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e49d7a855c8190b20bdbf6dcd4fd47 completed April 19, 2026, 9:16 a.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 10:19 a.m.