Triple
T1788897
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Awash River Basin |
E39449
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasManagementConcern |
P32405
|
FINISHED |
| Object | competing water demands |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: competing water demands | Statement: [Awash River Basin, hasManagementConcern, competing water demands]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasManagementConcern Context triple: [Awash River Basin, hasManagementConcern, competing water demands]
-
A.
hasManagement
Indicates that one entity exercises managerial authority or oversight over another entity.
-
B.
hasHealthConcern
Indicates that an entity has a specific health-related issue, condition, or concern associated with it.
-
C.
hasManagementPlan
Indicates that an entity is associated with a defined management plan specifying how it should be overseen, maintained, or administered.
-
D.
raisedConcernAbout
Indicates that one entity has expressed worry, doubt, or objection regarding another entity or issue.
-
E.
hasManagementGoal
Indicates that an entity is associated with a specific management objective or target it is intended to achieve or support.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a88631854081909723959921e45c2b |
completed | March 4, 2026, 7:21 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69ab75457e54819096b8c6ae8c65550c |
completed | March 7, 2026, 12:45 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69aa61d165688190924962a98e07ff69 |
completed | March 6, 2026, 5:10 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69ab75444d28819091c393e62fc97f82 |
completed | March 7, 2026, 12:45 a.m. |
Created at: March 4, 2026, 7:32 p.m.