Triple
T17867393
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Chesterfield Reefs |
E446737
|
entity |
| Predicate | sovereigntyDispute |
P38350
|
FINISHED |
| Object | France–Australia maritime claims |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (3 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: France–Australia maritime claims | Statement: [Chesterfield Reefs, sovereigntyDispute, France–Australia maritime claims]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: France–Australia maritime claims Context triple: [Chesterfield Reefs, sovereigntyDispute, France–Australia maritime claims]
-
A.
Beagle Channel dispute
The Beagle Channel dispute was a territorial conflict between Argentina and Chile over islands and maritime boundaries at the southern tip of South America that brought the two countries to the brink of war in the late 1970s.
-
B.
Norwegian Antarctic claim
The Norwegian Antarctic claim is Norway’s territorial claim in Antarctica, encompassing Queen Maud Land and associated coastal regions under Norwegian administration and research activity.
-
C.
South China Sea maritime claims
The South China Sea maritime claims are overlapping territorial and resource assertions by multiple countries over waters and features in the South China Sea, forming one of the world’s most complex and contentious maritime disputes.
-
D.
Mare Liberum
Mare Liberum is a seminal 1609 treatise by Hugo Grotius that argues for the principle of freedom of the seas in international law.
-
E.
France v. Turkey
France v. Turkey, known as the Lotus case, is a landmark 1927 decision of the Permanent Court of International Justice that shaped principles of jurisdiction and state sovereignty in international law.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NED2
Entity disambiguation (via description)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: France–Australia maritime claims Target entity description: France–Australia maritime claims refers to the overlapping maritime jurisdiction and sovereignty disputes between France and Australia in the Coral Sea, particularly around features such as the Chesterfield Reefs.
-
A.
Beagle Channel dispute
The Beagle Channel dispute was a territorial conflict between Argentina and Chile over islands and maritime boundaries at the southern tip of South America that brought the two countries to the brink of war in the late 1970s.
-
B.
Norwegian Antarctic claim
The Norwegian Antarctic claim is Norway’s territorial claim in Antarctica, encompassing Queen Maud Land and associated coastal regions under Norwegian administration and research activity.
-
C.
South China Sea maritime claims
The South China Sea maritime claims are overlapping territorial and resource assertions by multiple countries over waters and features in the South China Sea, forming one of the world’s most complex and contentious maritime disputes.
-
D.
Mare Liberum
Mare Liberum is a seminal 1609 treatise by Hugo Grotius that argues for the principle of freedom of the seas in international law.
-
E.
France v. Turkey
France v. Turkey, known as the Lotus case, is a landmark 1927 decision of the Permanent Court of International Justice that shaped principles of jurisdiction and state sovereignty in international law.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8b9f4c22c819093c2680434472894 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 8:51 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e49a9f95688190aeace742e8e7c4c0 |
completed | April 19, 2026, 9:04 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 10:17 a.m.