Triple

T17867393
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Chesterfield Reefs E446737 entity
Predicate sovereigntyDispute P38350 FINISHED
Object France–Australia maritime claims NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (3 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: France–Australia maritime claims | Statement: [Chesterfield Reefs, sovereigntyDispute, France–Australia maritime claims]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: France–Australia maritime claims
Context triple: [Chesterfield Reefs, sovereigntyDispute, France–Australia maritime claims]
  • A. Beagle Channel dispute
    The Beagle Channel dispute was a territorial conflict between Argentina and Chile over islands and maritime boundaries at the southern tip of South America that brought the two countries to the brink of war in the late 1970s.
  • B. Norwegian Antarctic claim
    The Norwegian Antarctic claim is Norway’s territorial claim in Antarctica, encompassing Queen Maud Land and associated coastal regions under Norwegian administration and research activity.
  • C. South China Sea maritime claims
    The South China Sea maritime claims are overlapping territorial and resource assertions by multiple countries over waters and features in the South China Sea, forming one of the world’s most complex and contentious maritime disputes.
  • D. Mare Liberum
    Mare Liberum is a seminal 1609 treatise by Hugo Grotius that argues for the principle of freedom of the seas in international law.
  • E. France v. Turkey
    France v. Turkey, known as the Lotus case, is a landmark 1927 decision of the Permanent Court of International Justice that shaped principles of jurisdiction and state sovereignty in international law.
  • F. None of above. chosen
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NED2 Entity disambiguation (via description) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: France–Australia maritime claims
Target entity description: France–Australia maritime claims refers to the overlapping maritime jurisdiction and sovereignty disputes between France and Australia in the Coral Sea, particularly around features such as the Chesterfield Reefs.
  • A. Beagle Channel dispute
    The Beagle Channel dispute was a territorial conflict between Argentina and Chile over islands and maritime boundaries at the southern tip of South America that brought the two countries to the brink of war in the late 1970s.
  • B. Norwegian Antarctic claim
    The Norwegian Antarctic claim is Norway’s territorial claim in Antarctica, encompassing Queen Maud Land and associated coastal regions under Norwegian administration and research activity.
  • C. South China Sea maritime claims
    The South China Sea maritime claims are overlapping territorial and resource assertions by multiple countries over waters and features in the South China Sea, forming one of the world’s most complex and contentious maritime disputes.
  • D. Mare Liberum
    Mare Liberum is a seminal 1609 treatise by Hugo Grotius that argues for the principle of freedom of the seas in international law.
  • E. France v. Turkey
    France v. Turkey, known as the Lotus case, is a landmark 1927 decision of the Permanent Court of International Justice that shaped principles of jurisdiction and state sovereignty in international law.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (2 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d8b9f4c22c819093c2680434472894 completed April 10, 2026, 8:51 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e49a9f95688190aeace742e8e7c4c0 completed April 19, 2026, 9:04 a.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 10:17 a.m.