Triple
T17863656
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | California State Board of Equalization districts |
E446134
|
entity |
| Predicate | subsequentRedistrictingYear |
P129065
|
FINISHED |
| Object | 2021 |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: 2021 | Statement: [California State Board of Equalization districts, subsequentRedistrictingYear, 2021]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: subsequentRedistrictingYear Context triple: [California State Board of Equalization districts, subsequentRedistrictingYear, 2021]
-
A.
notableRedistrictingYear
Indicates that a given year is recognized as significant for redistricting activities, such as major changes to electoral district boundaries.
-
B.
lastRedistrictingBasedOn
Indicates the redistricting event or plan that most recently served as the basis for the current district boundaries.
-
C.
hasRedistrictingCycle
Indicates that an entity is associated with a specific schedule or sequence of redistricting events, such as when and how its electoral districts are periodically redrawn.
-
D.
redistrictedBy
Indicates that an entity’s boundaries or districts have been altered or redefined by another specified agent or authority.
-
E.
redistrictedAfter
Indicates that one districting arrangement or boundary configuration was created or implemented following, and typically as a result of, another districting arrangement.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8b9f26f18819089c9e43250bee6ae |
completed | April 10, 2026, 8:50 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e49791b0c08190b04a426bd274065d |
completed | April 19, 2026, 8:51 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e3d8e6d2e88190ad9ef9f8a99f13e6 |
completed | April 18, 2026, 7:17 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69e3db7704588190a34a422421152173 |
completed | April 18, 2026, 7:28 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 10:17 a.m.