Triple

T17858527
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Cotton–Mouton effect E446002 entity
Predicate governingQuantity P75768 FINISHED
Object magnetic susceptibility anisotropy of the medium LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: magnetic susceptibility anisotropy of the medium | Statement: [Cotton–Mouton effect, governingQuantity, magnetic susceptibility anisotropy of the medium]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: governingQuantity
Context triple: [Cotton–Mouton effect, governingQuantity, magnetic susceptibility anisotropy of the medium]
  • A. quantificationType
    Indicates the specific kind or category of quantity or measurement being applied in a given context.
  • B. governsTypeOfUnit
    Indicates that one entity has authority or control over the type or category of unit to which another entity belongs.
  • C. relatesToQuantity
    Indicates a relationship where one entity is associated with, depends on, or is characterized by a specific quantity or amount.
  • D. quantifies
    Indicates that one entity expresses or specifies the amount, number, or degree of another entity.
  • E. mainQuantity chosen
    Indicates that the associated value represents the primary or principal quantity in a given context or relationship.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d8b9f26f18819089c9e43250bee6ae completed April 10, 2026, 8:50 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e4978e68ec8190a4306f7b7bb058d7 completed April 19, 2026, 8:51 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69e3d8e6d2e88190ad9ef9f8a99f13e6 completed April 18, 2026, 7:17 p.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 10:17 a.m.