Triple

Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).

Phrase: Heart of Atlanta Motel, Inc. v. United States | Statement: [Title II – Public Accommodations, upheldByCase, Heart of Atlanta Motel, Inc. v. United States]

Target entity: Heart of Atlanta Motel, Inc. v. United States
Context triple: [Title II – Public Accommodations, upheldByCase, Heart of Atlanta Motel, Inc. v. United States]

• A. Heart of Atlanta Motel, Inc. v. United States chosen
  Heart of Atlanta Motel, Inc. v. United States is a landmark 1964 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld the constitutionality of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 by affirming Congress’s power to prohibit racial discrimination in public accommodations under the Commerce Clause.
• B. NAACP v. Claiborne Hardware Co.
  NAACP v. Claiborne Hardware Co. is a landmark 1982 U.S. Supreme Court case that held nonviolent civil rights boycotts and related advocacy are protected by the First Amendment.
• C. Browder v. Gayle
  Browder v. Gayle was the landmark 1956 federal court case that declared bus segregation in Montgomery, Alabama unconstitutional, effectively ending the Montgomery bus boycott and striking a major blow against Jim Crow laws.
• D. Shuttlesworth v. Birmingham
  Shuttlesworth v. Birmingham is a 1969 U.S. Supreme Court case in which the Court struck down a city ordinance that gave officials broad discretion to deny parade permits, reinforcing First Amendment protections for civil rights demonstrators.
• E. Katzenbach v. McClung
  Katzenbach v. McClung is a 1964 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld the federal government’s power to prohibit racial discrimination in local restaurants under the Civil Rights Act of 1964.
• F. None of above.
• G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Target predicate: upheldByCase
Context triple: [Title II – Public Accommodations, upheldByCase, Heart of Atlanta Motel, Inc. v. United States]

• A. upheldBy chosen
  Indicates that one entity is supported, maintained, or validated by another, often through approval, enforcement, or confirmation of its validity.
• B. wasOverturnedByCourt
  Indicates that a prior decision, ruling, or judgment was reversed or nullified by a court.
• C. overturnedLaw
  Indicates that a previously established law has been invalidated or reversed, typically by a higher legal authority or court decision.
• D. overturnedInPartBy
  Indicates that a prior decision, ruling, or outcome has been partially reversed or modified by a later authority or action.
• E. doctrineHeld
  Indicates that an agent adheres to, supports, or maintains a particular doctrine or set of principles.
• F. None of above.