Triple
T17832675
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Blackstone River |
E445300
|
entity |
| Predicate | locatedIn |
P40
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Grafton |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Grafton | Statement: [Blackstone River, locatedIn, Grafton]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Grafton Context triple: [Blackstone River, locatedIn, Grafton]
-
A.
Grafton
Grafton is a small village in northeastern Ohio, United States, known for its residential community and proximity to the city of Cleveland.
-
B.
Grafton
Grafton is a suburban village in Ozaukee County, Wisconsin, known for its proximity to Milwaukee and its mix of residential neighborhoods, commercial areas, and access to the Milwaukee River.
-
C.
Grafton
Grafton is a regional city in northern New South Wales, Australia, known for its historic architecture and annual Jacaranda Festival.
-
D.
Grafton
Grafton is a small rural village located within the district of West Oxfordshire in England.
-
E.
Grafton, Massachusetts
chosen
Grafton, Massachusetts is a historic New England town known for its colonial-era roots, traditional town common, and role in the greater Worcester metropolitan area.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8b9f1a6d881909f024bc603111cdb |
completed | April 10, 2026, 8:50 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e48d257414819088730f48ad7ab9ae |
completed | April 19, 2026, 8:07 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 10:15 a.m.