Triple

T17827479
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Book III of A System of Logic E445156 entity
Predicate relatedTo P37 FINISHED
Object Mill’s methods of induction NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (3 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Mill’s methods of induction | Statement: [Book III of A System of Logic, relatedTo, Mill’s methods of induction]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Mill’s methods of induction
Context triple: [Book III of A System of Logic, relatedTo, Mill’s methods of induction]
  • A. The Philosophy of the Inductive Sciences
    The Philosophy of the Inductive Sciences is William Whewell’s major 19th-century work in the philosophy of science, elaborating a systematic account of scientific method and the role of induction in the development of scientific knowledge.
  • B. The Principles of Empirical or Inductive Logic
    The Principles of Empirical or Inductive Logic is a foundational 19th-century work by John Venn that systematically explores the theory and methodology of inductive reasoning in logic and probability.
  • C. History of the Inductive Sciences
    History of the Inductive Sciences is William Whewell’s comprehensive 19th-century survey of the development of scientific knowledge and methods from antiquity to his own time.
  • D. Carnap's continuum of inductive methods
    Carnap's continuum of inductive methods is a family of formal Bayesian-style confirmation functions that systematically vary how evidence updates degrees of belief in logical probability theory.
  • E. The Probability of Induction
    The Probability of Induction is a seminal essay by Charles Sanders Peirce that analyzes how probabilistic reasoning can justify inductive inference in scientific inquiry.
  • F. None of above. chosen
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NED2 Entity disambiguation (via description) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Mill’s methods of induction
Target entity description: Mill’s methods of induction are a set of systematic logical techniques proposed by John Stuart Mill for identifying causal relationships from empirical observations.
  • A. The Philosophy of the Inductive Sciences
    The Philosophy of the Inductive Sciences is William Whewell’s major 19th-century work in the philosophy of science, elaborating a systematic account of scientific method and the role of induction in the development of scientific knowledge.
  • B. The Principles of Empirical or Inductive Logic
    The Principles of Empirical or Inductive Logic is a foundational 19th-century work by John Venn that systematically explores the theory and methodology of inductive reasoning in logic and probability.
  • C. History of the Inductive Sciences
    History of the Inductive Sciences is William Whewell’s comprehensive 19th-century survey of the development of scientific knowledge and methods from antiquity to his own time.
  • D. Carnap's continuum of inductive methods
    Carnap's continuum of inductive methods is a family of formal Bayesian-style confirmation functions that systematically vary how evidence updates degrees of belief in logical probability theory.
  • E. The Probability of Induction
    The Probability of Induction is a seminal essay by Charles Sanders Peirce that analyzes how probabilistic reasoning can justify inductive inference in scientific inquiry.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (2 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d8b9f1a6d881909f024bc603111cdb completed April 10, 2026, 8:50 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e48915d0fc819080ab03feb2465834 completed April 19, 2026, 7:49 a.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 10:15 a.m.