Triple
T17825899
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Upper Umpqua language |
E445115
|
entity |
| Predicate | usedByTribe |
P129344
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Cow Creek Band of Umpqua Tribe of Indians (historically) |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (3 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Cow Creek Band of Umpqua Tribe of Indians (historically) | Statement: [Upper Umpqua language, usedByTribe, Cow Creek Band of Umpqua Tribe of Indians (historically)]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Cow Creek Band of Umpqua Tribe of Indians (historically) Context triple: [Upper Umpqua language, usedByTribe, Cow Creek Band of Umpqua Tribe of Indians (historically)]
-
A.
Cow Creek Band of Umpqua Tribe of Indians
chosen
The Cow Creek Band of Umpqua Tribe of Indians is a federally recognized Native American tribe in southwestern Oregon, traditionally associated with the Umpqua River region and known for its efforts to preserve its cultural heritage and exercise self-governance.
-
B.
Umpqua tribes
The Umpqua tribes are Indigenous peoples of southwestern Oregon whose descendants are now part of the Confederated Tribes of the Grand Ronde Community, with a cultural heritage rooted in the Umpqua River region.
-
C.
Confederated Tribes of Coos, Lower Umpqua and Siuslaw Indians
The Confederated Tribes of Coos, Lower Umpqua and Siuslaw Indians is a federally recognized Native American tribal government on the southern Oregon coast representing the Coos, Lower Umpqua, and Siuslaw peoples and working to preserve their cultural, political, and economic sovereignty.
-
D.
Confederated Tribes of Siletz Indians
The Confederated Tribes of Siletz Indians is a federally recognized confederation of diverse Indigenous peoples of western Oregon, formed from multiple tribes and bands that were relocated to the Siletz Reservation in the 19th century.
-
E.
Confederated Tribes of the Warm Springs Reservation of Oregon
The Confederated Tribes of the Warm Springs Reservation of Oregon is a federally recognized tribal government in north-central Oregon, composed primarily of the Warm Springs, Wasco, and Paiute peoples, with a large reservation along the Deschutes River.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: usedByTribe Context triple: [Upper Umpqua language, usedByTribe, Cow Creek Band of Umpqua Tribe of Indians (historically)]
-
A.
includesTribe
Indicates that one entity contains, encompasses, or has within it a particular tribe as a member or component.
-
B.
hasTribalAssociation
Indicates that an entity is affiliated with, belongs to, or is formally associated with a particular tribe or tribal group.
-
C.
hasTribalMembersFrom
Indicates that an entity includes or is composed of members originating from a specified tribe or tribal group.
-
D.
allocatedToTribe
Indicates that something (such as land, resources, or rights) has been formally assigned or designated to a specific tribe.
-
E.
hasRelatedTribe
Indicates that one tribe is associated or connected to another tribe in some relevant way, such as by kinship, alliance, or shared characteristics.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8b9f0de78819099395b14db75a8a6 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 8:50 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e48914226c819083edcc78e00b2d42 |
completed | April 19, 2026, 7:49 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e3d8e266888190ae976b4b7d5b886f |
completed | April 18, 2026, 7:17 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69e3f022ec448190a9bf191be1c5f570 |
completed | April 18, 2026, 8:57 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 10:15 a.m.