Triple

T17825279
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Quebec East E445098 entity
Predicate formerElectoralDistrict P20255 FINISHED
Object true LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: true | Statement: [Quebec East, formerElectoralDistrict, true]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: formerElectoralDistrict
Context triple: [Quebec East, formerElectoralDistrict, true]
  • A. formerDistrict chosen
    Indicates that one entity previously served as a district of another entity but no longer holds that status.
  • B. representedElectoralDistrict
    Indicates that an elected official served as the representative for a specific electoral district or constituency.
  • C. partOfElectoralDistrictType
    Indicates that one entity is a component or subdivision of a specified type of electoral district.
  • D. formerFederalElectoralDistrictNumber
    Indicates that an entity was previously designated with a specific federal electoral district number before being restructured, renumbered, or abolished.
  • E. formerlyInDistrict
    Indicates that an entity was once located in or part of a particular district, but is no longer within that district.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d8b9f0de78819099395b14db75a8a6 completed April 10, 2026, 8:50 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e48914226c819083edcc78e00b2d42 completed April 19, 2026, 7:49 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69e3d8e266888190ae976b4b7d5b886f completed April 18, 2026, 7:17 p.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 10:15 a.m.