Triple

T17818499
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Ross and Cromarty E444909 entity
Predicate unifiedAsCountyInYear P129020 FINISHED
Object 1889 LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: 1889 | Statement: [Ross and Cromarty, unifiedAsCountyInYear, 1889]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: unifiedAsCountyInYear
Context triple: [Ross and Cromarty, unifiedAsCountyInYear, 1889]
  • A. existedAsCountyUntil
    Indicates that an entity functioned with the status or designation of a county up to a specified end date or time period.
  • B. hasConsolidatedCityCountySince
    Indicates that a city and county have been formally consolidated into a single unified government entity starting from a specified point in time.
  • C. hasFormerCounty
    Indicates that an entity was previously part of, or administered by, a particular county in the past but no longer is.
  • D. enteredUnionAsCounty
    Indicates that an entity became part of a political union specifically with the status or designation of a county.
  • E. unitaryAuthoritySince
    Indicates the point in time from which an entity has held the status or role of a unitary authority.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d8b9f0de78819099395b14db75a8a6 completed April 10, 2026, 8:50 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e488812df081909771d51c54c405fe completed April 19, 2026, 7:47 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69e3d8de28688190844b65acf6af54e6 completed April 18, 2026, 7:17 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69e3db7704588190a34a422421152173 completed April 18, 2026, 7:28 p.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 10:14 a.m.