Triple

T17806054
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject G.726 E444560 entity
Predicate typicalSampleSize P55466 FINISHED
Object 16-bit linear PCM equivalent LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: 16-bit linear PCM equivalent | Statement: [G.726, typicalSampleSize, 16-bit linear PCM equivalent]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: typicalSampleSize
Context triple: [G.726, typicalSampleSize, 16-bit linear PCM equivalent]
  • A. typicalSampleSizeRuleOfThumb
    Indicates a heuristic guideline that specifies a commonly recommended sample size to use in typical situations or standard study designs.
  • B. sampleSize chosen
    Indicates the number of units, observations, or instances included in a particular study, experiment, or dataset.
  • C. typicalClassSize
    Indicates the usual or average number of students (or participants) that are present in a single class or course section.
  • D. typicalGroupSize
    Indicates the usual or characteristic number of individuals that typically form a group in this context.
  • E. hasTypicalMemberSize
    Indicates the usual or characteristic size associated with members of a given class or group.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d8b9efe370819095cd219b143ae727 completed April 10, 2026, 8:50 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e4880385b48190b8dea0f05dfa1300 completed April 19, 2026, 7:45 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69e3d8de28688190844b65acf6af54e6 completed April 18, 2026, 7:17 p.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 10:14 a.m.