Triple

Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).

Phrase: A. K. Gopalan v. State of Madras | Statement: [A. K. Gopalan, subjectOf, A. K. Gopalan v. State of Madras]

Target entity: A. K. Gopalan v. State of Madras
Context triple: [A. K. Gopalan, subjectOf, A. K. Gopalan v. State of Madras]

• A. A. C. Jose v. Sivan Pillai
  A. C. Jose v. Sivan Pillai is a landmark Supreme Court of India judgment that clarified the scope of the Election Commission’s powers in conducting elections under the Indian Constitution.
• B. S. R. Bommai v. Union of India
  S. R. Bommai v. Union of India is a landmark 1994 Supreme Court of India judgment that curtailed the arbitrary use of President’s Rule and strengthened federalism by applying the basic structure doctrine to center-state relations.
• C. I.C. Golaknath v. State of Punjab
  I.C. Golaknath v. State of Punjab is a landmark 1967 Indian Supreme Court case that held Parliament could not amend fundamental rights under the Constitution, sharply limiting its amending power until this view was later modified.
• D. I.R. Coelho v. State of Tamil Nadu
  I.R. Coelho v. State of Tamil Nadu is a landmark 2007 Supreme Court of India judgment that reaffirmed and strengthened the basic structure doctrine by holding that even laws placed in the Ninth Schedule are subject to judicial review if they violate the Constitution’s fundamental framework.
• E. Waman Rao v. Union of India
  Waman Rao v. Union of India is a landmark 1981 Supreme Court of India judgment that reaffirmed and clarified the basic structure doctrine by upholding its applicability to constitutional amendments made after the Kesavananda Bharati decision.
• F. None of above. chosen
• G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Target entity: A. K. Gopalan v. State of Madras
Target entity description: A. K. Gopalan v. State of Madras is a landmark 1950 decision of the Supreme Court of India that narrowly interpreted fundamental rights and upheld preventive detention laws under the Constitution.

• A. A. C. Jose v. Sivan Pillai
  A. C. Jose v. Sivan Pillai is a landmark Supreme Court of India judgment that clarified the scope of the Election Commission’s powers in conducting elections under the Indian Constitution.
• B. S. R. Bommai v. Union of India
  S. R. Bommai v. Union of India is a landmark 1994 Supreme Court of India judgment that curtailed the arbitrary use of President’s Rule and strengthened federalism by applying the basic structure doctrine to center-state relations.
• C. I.C. Golaknath v. State of Punjab
  I.C. Golaknath v. State of Punjab is a landmark 1967 Indian Supreme Court case that held Parliament could not amend fundamental rights under the Constitution, sharply limiting its amending power until this view was later modified.
• D. I.R. Coelho v. State of Tamil Nadu
  I.R. Coelho v. State of Tamil Nadu is a landmark 2007 Supreme Court of India judgment that reaffirmed and strengthened the basic structure doctrine by holding that even laws placed in the Ninth Schedule are subject to judicial review if they violate the Constitution’s fundamental framework.
• E. Waman Rao v. Union of India
  Waman Rao v. Union of India is a landmark 1981 Supreme Court of India judgment that reaffirmed and clarified the basic structure doctrine by upholding its applicability to constitutional amendments made after the Kesavananda Bharati decision.
• F. None of above. chosen